Fraud risk factors
/What are Fraud Risk Factors?
A business can lose a significant amount of assets due to fraud. At an extreme level, the effects of fraud can even shut down a company. Consequently, a business owner should make ongoing efforts to create an environment in which fraud is less likely to arise. There are a number of factors that make it more likely that fraud will occur or is occurring in a business. These fraud risk factors include the following:
Nature of Items
Size and value. If items that can be stolen are of high value in proportion to their size (such as diamonds), it is less risky to remove them from the premises. This is a particularly critical item if it is easy for employees to to remove assets without being detected.
Ease of resale. If there is a ready market for the resale of stolen goods (such as for most types of consumer electronics), this presents an increased temptation to engage in fraud.
Cash. If there is a large amount of bills and coins on hand, or cash in bank accounts, there is a very high risk of fraud. At a local level, a large balance in a petty cash box presents a considerable temptation to anyone who has access to it.
Related AccountingTools Courses
Nature of the Control Environment
Separation of duties. The risk of fraud declines dramatically if multiple employees are involved in different phases of a transaction, since fraud requires the collusion of at least two people. Thus, poorly-defined job descriptions and approval processes present a clear opportunity for fraud. This is a particular concern in smaller businesses that do not have enough employees to separate duties.
Safeguards. When assets are physically protected, they are much less likely to be stolen. This can involve fencing around the inventory storage area, a locked bin for maintenance supplies and tools, security guard stations, an employee badge system, and similar solutions.
Documentation. When there is no physical or electronic record of a transaction, employees can be reasonably assured of not being caught, and so are more inclined to engage in fraud. This is also the case when there is documentation, but the records can be easily modified.
Time off. When a business requires its employees to take the full amount of allocated time off, this keeps them from continuing to hide ongoing cases of fraud, and so is a natural deterrent.
Related party transactions. When there are numerous transactions with related parties, it is more likely that purchases and sales will be made at amounts that differ considerably from the market price.
Complexity. When the nature of a company's business involves very complex transactions, and especially ones involving estimates, it is easier for employees to manipulate the results of these transactions to report better results than is really the case.
Dominance. When a single individual is in a position to dominate the decisions of the management team, and especially when the board of directors is weak, this individual is more likely to engage in unsuitable behavior.
Turnover. When there is a high level of turnover among the management team and among employees in general, the institutional memory regarding how transactions are processed is weakened, resulting in less attention to controls.
Auditing. When there is no internal audit function, it is unlikely that incorrect or inappropriate transactions will be spotted or corrected.
Pressures
Level of dissatisfaction. If the workforce is unhappy with the company, they will be more inclined to engage in fraud. Examples of such situations are when a layoff is imminent, benefits have been reduced, bonuses have been eliminated, promotions have been voided, and so forth.
Expectations. When there is pressure from outside investors to report certain financial results, or by management to meet certain performance targets (perhaps to earn bonuses), or to meet balance sheet goals to qualify for debt financing, there is a high risk of financial reporting fraud.
Guarantees. When the owners or members of management have guaranteed company debt, there will be strong pressure to report certain financial results in order to avoid triggering the guarantees.